Rebecca Review: The Gothic Suspense Novel That Still Haunts

Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier

Author: Daphne du Maurier · Published: 1938 · Genre: Gothic Suspense, Psychological Thriller

Rebecca is a near-perfect suspense novel about a young bride haunted by her husband’s dead first wife. It is less a whodunit than a study of jealousy, class and power, and it builds dread without a single ghost. Read it if you like atmosphere and slow-burn tension. The narrator’s meekness is the main thing that divides readers.

What it’s about The narrator, whose first name we never learn, is a shy young woman working as a paid companion to a vulgar, wealthy American, Mrs Van Hopper, in Monte Carlo. There she meets Maxim de Winter, an older widower and the owner of Manderley, a famous estate on the Cornish coast. After a whirlwind courtship, he marries her and takes her home.

Manderley is beautiful and oppressive. Everything in it bears the mark of Maxim’s first wife, Rebecca, who died at sea the year before: her monogrammed stationery, her routines, her perfectly arranged rooms, her admirers. The housekeeper, Mrs Danvers, was devoted to Rebecca and treats the new Mrs de Winter with icy contempt. The narrator becomes convinced that she can never measure up, and that Maxim is still in love with the woman he lost. Then, gradually, Manderley’s secrets begin to surface.

What works – Atmosphere. Du Maurier turns a house into a character: the closed-up west wing, the restless sea, the blood-red rhododendrons, the fog on the cliffs. The famous opening, in which the narrator dreams of going back to Manderley, sets a mood of loss that never lifts. Du Maurier knew the Cornish coast intimately, and Manderley was partly inspired by Menabilly, an old house near Fowey. – Mrs Danvers. She is one of fiction’s great menacing figures, frightening through loyalty and patience rather than violence. Her scenes, especially in Rebecca’s carefully preserved bedroom, are chilling. – Psychology. The narrator’s jealousy and insecurity are dissected with brutal honesty. The real suspense happens in her head: every glance, every comparison, every awkward dinner and social call becomes a small ordeal. – A portrait built from others. Rebecca never appears, yet she dominates the book. We see her through Maxim’s blunt, kind sister Beatrice, the loyal estate manager Frank Crawley, Mrs Danvers and Rebecca’s swaggering cousin Jack Favell, and each account adds a different shade. – The change of gear. In the final third, the novel shifts, and what seemed a romance about jealousy becomes something harder, darker and far more morally complicated. Du Maurier handles the transition with complete control.

What doesn’t The narrator can be exhausting. She is timid, self-abasing and prone to long imagined scenes of humiliation, and some readers lose patience with her well before the plot turns. Maxim is cold and often cruel, and the novel’s picture of marriage, with its young wife treated almost as a child, can make modern readers uneasy. The moral balance of the ending is deliberately uncomfortable, and du Maurier makes no attempt to resolve it. Whether that is a flaw or the point depends on the reader.

There were also questions about originality. The Brazilian writer Carolina Nabuco’s 1934 novel A Sucessora, about a young second wife overshadowed by her predecessor, was said to share striking similarities, and du Maurier publicly rejected the claim. In the United States, Edwina MacDonald sued, alleging the book copied her 1927 novel Blind Windows; the case was dismissed in 1948. Plots about second wives and powerful first ones were not new, and the charge never stuck.

Who should read it Readers who like slow-burn psychological suspense, Gothic houses and unreliable perceptions. If you have only seen Alfred Hitchcock’s 1940 film, the novel is richer, stranger and darker. If you need a fast plot or a heroine with backbone, it may frustrate you.

Rating: 4.5/5

Photo credits — Featured image: Photo by Brian Jiz on Pexels.